Forward-Secure 0-RTT Goes Live: Implementation and Performance Analysis in QUIC

Fynn Dallmeier; Jan P.  Drees; Kai Gellert; Tobias Handirk; Tibor Jager; Jonas Klauke; Simon Nachtigall; Timo Renzelmann; Rudi Wolf

Paper 2020/824

Forward-Secure 0-RTT Goes Live: Implementation and Performance Analysis in QUIC

Fynn Dallmeier, Jan P. Drees, Kai Gellert, Tobias Handirk, Tibor Jager, Jonas Klauke, Simon Nachtigall, Timo Renzelmann, and Rudi Wolf

Abstract

Modern cryptographic protocols, such as TLS 1.3 and QUIC, can send cryptographically protected data in "zero round-trip times (0-RTT)", that is, without the need for a prior interactive handshake. Such protocols meet the demand for communication with minimal latency, but those currently deployed in practice achieve only rather weak security properties, as they may not achieve forward security for the first transmitted payload message and require additional countermeasures against replay attacks. Recently, 0-RTT protocols with full forward security and replay resilience have been proposed in the academic literature. These are based on puncturable encryption, which uses rather heavy building blocks, such as cryptographic pairings. Some constructions were claimed to have practical efficiency, but it is unclear how they compare concretely to protocols deployed in practice, and we currently do not have any benchmark results that new protocols can be compared with. We provide the first concrete performance analysis of a modern 0-RTT protocol with full forward security, by integrating the Bloom Filter Encryption scheme of Derler et al. (EUROCRYPT 2018) in the Chromium QUIC implementation and comparing it to Google's original QUIC protocol. We find that for reasonable deployment parameters, the server CPU load increases approximately by a factor of eight and the memory consumption on the server increases significantly, but stays below 400 MB even for medium-scale deployments that handle up to 50K connections per day. The difference of the size of handshake messages is small enough that transmission time on the network is identical, and therefore not significant. We conclude that while current 0-RTT protocols with full forward security come with significant computational overhead, their use in practice is not infeasible, and may be used in applications where the increased CPU and memory load can be tolerated in exchange for full forward security and replay resilience on the cryptographic protocol level. Our results also serve as a first benchmark that can be used to assess the efficiency of 0-RTT protocols potentially developed in the future.

Metadata

Available format(s): PDF
Category: Implementation
Publication info: Published elsewhere. Minor revision. CANS 2020 - 19th International Conference on Cryptology and Network Security
Keywords: 0-RTT key exchange forward security QUIC implementation experimental analysis puncturable encryption
Contact author(s): kai gellert @ uni-wuppertal de
tibor jager @ uni-wuppertal de
tobias handirk @ uni-wuppertal de
History: 2020-10-06: revised; 2020-07-07: received; See all versions
Short URL: https://ia.cr/2020/824
License: CC BY

BibTeX

@misc{cryptoeprint:2020/824,
      author = {Fynn Dallmeier and Jan P.  Drees and Kai Gellert and Tobias Handirk and Tibor Jager and Jonas Klauke and Simon Nachtigall and Timo Renzelmann and Rudi Wolf},
      title = {Forward-Secure 0-RTT Goes Live: Implementation and Performance Analysis in QUIC},
      howpublished = {Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2020/824},
      year = {2020},
      note = {\url{https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/824}},
      url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/824}
}